ColoradoProspector   CP Club Membership Info.

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Trouble near Boulder, Jeepers trying to claim private road
59er
post Jun 4 2006, 10:05 PM
Post #1


Diggin' In!
**

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 246



Heads up: the Denver metro area Jeep clubs are attempting to claim that another private mining road is public for their joy rides and other entertainment. The miner that owns it has been experiencing vandalism and closed it to the vandals. Recent article in the Times-Call:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=7779

Here is a forum where the off-road clubs are debating whether or not to respect the owner's right to close his property:

http://colorado4x4.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=65365

This is happening alot in the front range where new uses are clashing with traditional uses.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
CP
post Jun 8 2006, 07:44 AM
Post #2


Master Mucker!
*****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,149
Joined: 7-October 03
From: Colorado
Member No.: 3



Well after reading through the article and some of the posts in that thread ......in my honest opinion this miner DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO CLOSE THE FS ROAD!

First of all........FS roads are not privately owned........or private roads are not named/maintained by FS......so this is a public fs road for use by ALL CITIZENS.....INCLUDING HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS AND OTHER MINERS/PROSPECTORS!

As for the 4WD folks........I really doubt if they are they ones who shot holes in anything....those folks are out to do some off roadin and not blow stuff up. Frankly the holes more than likely came from young teens with too much time on their hands or hunters?
Has anyone been tried and convicted of the vandalism yet?
At any rate attempting to close off OUR FOREST is not the answer.

Seems to me the miners and citizens are gettin the shaft! FS land is OURS not the district ranger and a few local influences!
Fences and or gates don't keep out bullets either.
Is this an active mine......oh no that's right....been inactive for how long?
The way it was first presented almost would lead someone to think it was active......which if it was, the mine/buildings would probably not have been vandalized so......right?

Sorry I just really can't see that this gate is legal, granted I have not visited this mine. But from what I've seen so far..........bad deal


CP


--------------------
CP-Owner/Administrator
www.ColoradoProspector.com

IF YOU USE IT, THE GROUND PRODUCED IT!
MINERS MAKE "IT" HAPPEN!!


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- 59er   Trouble near Boulder   Jun 4 2006, 10:05 PM
- - ColoradoProspector   Well after reading through the article and some of...   Jun 8 2006, 07:44 AM
- - 59er   CP, the problem is that the FS does not own the ri...   Jun 8 2006, 11:48 PM
- - ColoradoProspector   Thanks for posting this info 59er and I'm stil...   Jun 10 2006, 09:45 AM
- - 59er   Hey CP, thanks for keeping an open mind. I think ...   Jun 11 2006, 08:12 AM
- - Coalbunny   I think Dan is right, so far. Before any decision...   Jun 14 2006, 09:38 PM
- - plp.001   The laws on rights of wqy can be found in the 1866...   Jun 15 2006, 07:48 AM
- - plp.001   Of course if that ingress egress interferes with a...   Jun 15 2006, 07:52 AM
- - 59er   Jerry, Not any road built between 1866 and 1976 i...   Jun 15 2006, 08:59 PM
- - plp.001   59er You don't have to prove thaqt the road w...   Jun 15 2006, 11:21 PM
- - Coalbunny   Also depends on the deals the claim owners had in ...   Jun 15 2006, 11:37 PM
- - 59er   Jerry, I think you are misreading RS 2477. It say...   Jun 16 2006, 09:49 PM
- - 59er   Coalbunny. I think this sorta thing happened all ...   Jun 16 2006, 09:58 PM
- - 59er   I did a little research. A couple weeks ago a jud...   Jun 17 2006, 08:14 AM
- - plp.001   59er The courts have found both ways for and agai...   Jun 17 2006, 09:14 AM
- - Coalbunny   Exactly 59er. They should have had it documented ...   Jun 18 2006, 05:31 AM
- - plp.001   I know that San Bernardino County and several othe...   Jun 18 2006, 07:25 AM
- - 59er   I'd be interested in knowing if any of these a...   Jun 21 2006, 07:17 PM
- - wheasonjr   Hi 59er On many patented properties for mining...   Jul 12 2006, 10:56 AM
- - russau   my x-father-in-law had two acres of property(2 sid...   Jul 13 2006, 04:54 AM
- - plp.001   Russ and all RS 2477 Rights of way do not have to...   Jul 13 2006, 09:14 AM
- - 59er   I don't think that this is an RS 2477 right of...   Jul 13 2006, 09:54 PM
- - 59er   Looks like this is a done deal. I guess there was...   Aug 2 2006, 08:37 PM
- - Gotgold   I joined the forum this morning, this topic regard...   Aug 15 2006, 04:15 AM
- - rehab   if the man owns the property (as in patented minin...   Aug 15 2006, 12:23 PM
- - rehab   with the 59er story, I think the guy would have to...   Aug 15 2006, 12:31 PM
- - Goldshark   When patented mining claims transfer from public t...   Jan 3 2022, 10:30 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
8 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th May 2025 - 11:06 PM