If we had a emotioncon that was tossin it's cookies it would be here
Large drawn out SIIIIIIIGGGHHHHHH!
Okay, here we go. Classic move by the FS......
I just did a bit of looking through the gov pages and now
slightly irratated This is what I found about "recreational areas" in the CFR's.
It's about the Sawtooth national rec area......was it the first? I have no idea.
I do know that it's FS land and your claim is FS land....belongs to the citizens and should be consistent from one state to the next......right?
K.......Got a fresh cup o java?..........
A few sections I just pulled off the gov CFR pages........
QUOTE
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 36, Volume 2]
[Revised as of July 1, 2005]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 36CFR292]
[Page 369-396]
TITLE 36--PARKS, FORESTS, AND PUBLIC PROPERTY
CHAPTER II--FOREST SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 292_NATIONAL RECREATION AREAS
Sec. 292.11 Introduction.
(a) Administration of the Shasta and Clair Engle-Lewiston Units will
be coordinated with the other purposes of the Central Valley Project of
the Bureau of Reclamation and of the recreation area as a whole so as to
provide for: (1) Public outdoor recreation benefits; (2) conservation of
scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public
enjoyment; and (3) the management, utilization, and disposal of
renewable natural resources which in the judgment of the Secretary of
Agriculture will promote or is compatible with, and does not
significantly impair, public recreation and conservation of scenic,
scientific, historic, or other values contributing to public enjoyment.
(b) The Secretary may not acquire without consent of the owner any
privately owned ``improved property'' or interests therein within the
boundaries of these units, so long as the appropriate local zoning
agency shall have in force and applicable to such property a duly
adopted, valid, zoning ordinance that is approved by the Secretary. This
suspension of the Secretary's authority to acquire ``improved property''
without the owner's consent would automatically cease: (1) If the
property is made the subject of a variance or exception to any
applicable zoning ordinance that does not conform to the applicable
standards contained in Sec. Sec. 292.11 to 292.13; or (2) if such
property is put to any use which does not conform to any applicable
zoning ordinance approved by the Secretary.
© Definitions
(5) Mineral operations. All functions, work and activities in
connection with exploration, development, mining or processing of
mineral resources except prospecting which will not cause significant
surface disturbance and will not involve removal of more than a
reasonable amount of mineral deposit for analysis and study.
292.18 Mineral resources.
(h) Mineral operations. The standards set forth in this paragraph
shall apply to a private property or portion thereof in any land use
category which is used for mineral operations. To aid in determining
whether a planned mineral operation will conform to these standards, the
owner of the property shall submit to the Area Ranger a proposed plan of
operations. If the Area Ranger determines that the proposed operation
conforms to the standards established herein he will approve the plan
and such approval shall constitute the certification provided for in
Sec. 292.15(d).
(1) Operations will be confined to those locations where they may be
conducted without substantially impairing or detracting from the scenic,
natural, historic, pastoral, and fish and wildlife values of the area.
(2) The general standards set forth in paragraph © of this section
shall apply to any mineral operations.
(3) The operations as described in the plan of operation and as they
are carried out in accordance with the plan shall:
(i) Comply with Federal and State air and water quality and waste
disposal standards.
(ii) Minimize adverse impacts on scenic values.
(iii) Provide for prompt stabilization and restoration of areas
disturbed by the operations.
[39 FR 11544, Mar. 29, 1974, as amended at 69 FR 55094, Sept. 13, 2004]
Subpart D_Sawtooth National Recreation Area_Federal Lands
Authority: Sec. 1, 30 Stat. 35, 36, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 478, 551;
sec. 11, 86 Stat. 612, 16 U.S.C. 460aa-10.
Well that don't sound like it being a "recreation area" withdraws it! Does it?
I'll keep looking through it when I got more time but sounds like you may want to start reading up on this yourself.
Fostering and encouraging? hmmmmmmmmmmm
CP