Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

Colorado Prospector - Gem and mineral prospecting and mining forums _ Fight For Your Rights! _ 1866 Not a Grant for water

Posted by: Mineral Estate Grantee Jul 3 2014, 04:07 PM

It's better than a grant.
It's a pre-existing right of possession, a valid claim, requiring protecton of government.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=438&invol=645

The Mining Act of 1866 was not itself a grant of water rights pursuant to federal law. Instead, as this Court observed, the Act was "`a voluntary recognition of a preexisting right of possession, constituting a valid claim to its continued use.'" United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrig. Co., supra, at 705. Congress intended "to recognize as valid the customary law with respect to the use of water which had grown up among the occupants of the public land under the peculiar necessities of their condition." 10 Basey v. Gallagher, 20 Wall. 670, 684 (1875). See Broder v. Water Co., supra, at 276; Jennison v. Kirk, 98 U.S. 453, 459 -461 (1879). 11 [438 U.S. 645, 657]

Posted by: russau Jul 4 2014, 04:58 AM

Thankyou Mr. M.E.G. and have a Happy 4th of July!

Posted by: fenixsmom Jul 4 2014, 05:37 PM

Good to know! Thank you for sharing this nugget of knowledge!