Trouble near Boulder, Jeepers trying to claim private road |
Colorado Prospector - Gem and mineral prospecting and mining forums > Prospecting, Mineral Collecting and Treasure Hunting Forums > Prospectors and Rockhounding Field WorkTrouble near Boulder, Jeepers trying to claim private road |
 Jun 4 2006, 10:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Diggin' In!  Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 246  |
Heads up: the Denver metro area Jeep clubs are attempting to claim that another private mining road is public for their joy rides and other entertainment. The miner that owns it has been experiencing vandalism and closed it to the vandals. Recent article in the Times-Call:
http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=7779 Here is a forum where the off-road clubs are debating whether or not to respect the owner's right to close his property: http://colorado4x4.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=65365 This is happening alot in the front range where new uses are clashing with traditional uses. |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jun 15 2006, 07:48 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Shovel Buster! Group: Members Posts: 179 Joined: 2-May 05 Member No.: 252 |
The laws on rights of wqy can be found in the 1866 MINING lAW. Try looking
RS 2477 from the mining law. Any Road built between 1866 and 1976 (FLPMA) is a public right of way. Jerry |
|
|
|
59er Trouble near Boulder Jun 4 2006, 10:05 PM
ColoradoProspector Well after reading through the article and some of... Jun 8 2006, 07:44 AM 59er CP, the problem is that the FS does not own the ri... Jun 8 2006, 11:48 PM ColoradoProspector Thanks for posting this info 59er and I'm stil... Jun 10 2006, 09:45 AM 59er Hey CP, thanks for keeping an open mind.
I think ... Jun 11 2006, 08:12 AM Coalbunny I think Dan is right, so far. Before any decision... Jun 14 2006, 09:38 PM plp.001 Of course if that ingress egress interferes with a... Jun 15 2006, 07:52 AM 59er Jerry,
Not any road built between 1866 and 1976 i... Jun 15 2006, 08:59 PM plp.001 59er
You don't have to prove thaqt the road w... Jun 15 2006, 11:21 PM Coalbunny Also depends on the deals the claim owners had in ... Jun 15 2006, 11:37 PM 59er Jerry, I think you are misreading RS 2477. It say... Jun 16 2006, 09:49 PM 59er Coalbunny. I think this sorta thing happened all ... Jun 16 2006, 09:58 PM 59er I did a little research.
A couple weeks ago a jud... Jun 17 2006, 08:14 AM plp.001 59er
The courts have found both ways for and agai... Jun 17 2006, 09:14 AM Coalbunny Exactly 59er. They should have had it documented ... Jun 18 2006, 05:31 AM plp.001 I know that San Bernardino County and several othe... Jun 18 2006, 07:25 AM 59er I'd be interested in knowing if any of these a... Jun 21 2006, 07:17 PM wheasonjr Hi 59er
On many patented properties for mining... Jul 12 2006, 10:56 AM russau my x-father-in-law had two acres of property(2 sid... Jul 13 2006, 04:54 AM plp.001 Russ and all
RS 2477 Rights of way do not have to... Jul 13 2006, 09:14 AM 59er I don't think that this is an RS 2477 right of... Jul 13 2006, 09:54 PM 59er Looks like this is a done deal. I guess there was... Aug 2 2006, 08:37 PM Gotgold I joined the forum this morning, this topic regard... Aug 15 2006, 04:15 AM rehab if the man owns the property (as in patented minin... Aug 15 2006, 12:23 PM rehab with the 59er story, I think the guy would have to... Aug 15 2006, 12:31 PM
Goldshark When patented mining claims transfer from public t... Jan 3 2022, 10:30 PM |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th May 2025 - 10:37 PM |
